The Journal of Working-Class Studies invites submissions that contribute significant knowledge to our understanding of who the global working class(es) are and have been, as well as what it means to ‘study’ class, conceptually and as a socio-economic reality. We are especially keen to publish work that explores how class intersects with other vectors of identity and experience, including race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, ability, and citizenship status.
All scholarly submissions are blind peer reviewed.
We also invite artists to submit short comics or excerpts of longer works.
Submissions should be between 4-6000 words (or its multimedia equivalent), not including the bibliography and other references. This length is to allow ease of access for researchers, students and general public readers, however we are happy to consider longer submissions as appropriate.
Referencing style, formatting and copyright
Please submit submissions as Word or PDF files. We prefer the use of 12 point, Times New Roman font, with footnotes rather than endnotes.
The house style is Harvard, which includes in-text referencing of author, year and page/s used. For websites please include author’s name (if known), Url and date accessed. For further examples see:
Authors retain the copyright for their original material submitted, and they are also responsible for acknowledging, and where necessary, gaining permission, for copyright material used that is owned by other people. For further guidance on this please contact the journal editors.
The Journal of Working-Class Studies reviews books that feature working-class people, communities, culture, history, politics, and/or experience as a crucial component of their scholarly or artistic vision. The book review editor will consider all proposals based on their appropriateness and relevance to the journal’s aims.
Authors and editors who would like to submit a book to be considered for review may send a copy to:
Dr. Christie Launius, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, 800 Algoma Blvd, Oshkosh, WI 54901, USA
The book review editor also commissions reviews for the journal. If you are interested in serving as a reviewer for the journal, please send an email stating your interest, as well as a brief description of your qualifications to firstname.lastname@example.org
Guidelines for book reviews are as follows:
- 1,000 words for reviews of single books.
- 1300-1500 words for ‘cluster’ reviews, or reviews of multiple thematically connected works.
In your review, please clearly state how:
- The book makes a significant contribution the field of Working-Class Studies.
- What the book has to offer on its own, or how its arguments and insights bring something necessary or ‘new’ to the conversation(s) it is looking to enter.
Submission and review timelines
The Journal of Working-Class Studies is published three times a year. We endeavour to have submissions made to the journal sent to peer review in a timely manner, but we are also aware that peer review work, and any subsequent revision, needs to be managed around other commitments. If articles cannot be reviewed within the required timeline, please let us know and we will work to help find room in subsequent issues. However we ask that authors do not submit work to the journal that is currently being considered elsewhere.
Where to send submissions
Please send all submissions, as Word documents, to email@example.com
Authors are responsible for the copyright of all submissions – please do not send work that is currently under consideration elsewhere or has been previously published (without first seeking permission to do so).
Articles not accepted
Not all articles submitted for consideration to the Journal of Working Class-Studies will be accepted for publication. There are a variety of reasons for this, including most importantly, each submission’s scope and place in the field. Please read the About section of our website for details of the discipline, as well as past issues. We are eager to expand the field but also to maintain our focus on working class experiences and issues, ensuring quality through the blind peer review process.